人生大不同

 找回密码
 立即注册

扫一扫,访问微社区

搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
查看: 2896|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

NFL Jerseys Wholesale ” Justice Singh said.He had added

[复制链接]
  • TA的每日心情
    无聊
    2018-8-4 00:28
  • 签到天数: 260 天

    [LV.8]以坛为家I

    906

    主题

    912

    帖子

    7834

    积分

    论坛元老

    Rank: 8Rank: 8

    积分
    7834
    跳转到指定楼层
    楼主
    发表于 2018-7-15 23:12:29 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
    – Former Auditor GeneralThe recent ruling by Chief Justice (ag) Ian Chang on the Presidential term limit, is according to Former Auditor General Anand Goolsarran, enough evidence to prove just how inappropriate it is to have one Judge presiding over the Constitutional Court.On Friday last, the CJ ruled that the presidential term limit imposed by the 2001 amendment to Article 90 of the Constitution is unconstitutional, unless it is approved by the citizens in a referendum.That article states that: (a) a person who acceded to the Presidency after the year 2000 is eligible for re-election only once; and (b) a person who acceded to the Presidency after the year 2000 and served therein on a single occasion for less than  such period as may be determined by the National Assembly, is eligible for election as President only once.The Chief Justice ruled that the approval of the people through a referendum is needed for placing term limits on the Presidency and that the 2001 constitutional amendment is invalid and without legal effect.Chang, in his ruling, asserted that: “There can be no doubt that Parliament could have altered Article 90 by two-thirds majority of all the elected members of the National Assembly. But in so far as those alterations diminished and further restricted democratic sovereignty which, under Article 164(2) was procedurally protected by the requirement of a referendum for its legal validity and efficacy, the holding of a referendum was required”.Chief Justice Ian ChangFormer Auditor General, Anand GoolsarranGoolsarran recalled that Chang referred to Article 164 (2) (a) of the Constitution “which requires any Bill to amend Article 90 to be supported by: not less than two and not more than six months after its passage through the National Assembly…rovided that if the Bill does not alter any of the provisions mentioned in subparagraph (a) and is supported at a final voting in the Assembly by votes of not less than two-thirds of all the elected members of the Assembly it shall not be necessary to submit the Bill to the vote of the electors.”Subparagraph (a) refers to any alteration to articles 1, 2, 8, 9, 18, 51, 66, 89, 99 and 111.Since Article 90 is not listed in subparagraph (a), Goolsarran said that there is no need for a referendum, since the Bill to amend article 90 was supported by two-thirds of the votes of all the elected members of the Assembly.He recalled that Chang,China Jerseys Cheap, however, justified his ruling by contending that the amendments to Article 90 “curtail people’s democratic choices” and offends declarations in Articles 1 and 9 that Guyana is a “democratic state” in which “sovereignty resides in the people.”Goolsarran in his recent writings said that it is improper for the adjudication of all constitutional matters to be placed in the hand of a single individual, regardless of how knowledgeable and experienced he/she may be in such matters.He added, “Besides, the person has been acting in the position of Chief Justice for about a decade, which can have a negative impact on the independence of the judiciary.”The Former Auditor General said that given that the Constitution is the highest law of the land, it would have been more appropriate for a group of eminent judges to be involved, so that any pronouncement would have the benefit of the collective view, as opposed to an individual one.He reminded, however, that former Speaker Raphael Trotman, who was a respondent in the matter, has signaled an intention to test the ruling “in the highest court, because if allowed to stand it would really undermine the very constitutional framework of the country and put the entire country into a tailspin”.Chang’s ruling was also disapproved of by Prof. Justice Duke Pollard who said, “The judgment is arguably tendentious, occasionally pleonastic, bereft of sustained rationality,Cheap Jerseys USA, and strangely and curiously, not to mention inexcusably, has eschewed the application of the required rule of statutory interpretation in construing the provisions of Article 1 of the Guyana Constitution, given the concatenation of genus-describing attributes employed therein….”“In my respectful submission, therefore, the determination of our learned Chief Justice in Cedric Richardson v Attorney General and Raphael Trotman is irretrievably flawed and is likely to be overturned on appeal, given among other deficiencies, an arguable perception of bias by reference to the relevant provisions of the Bangalore Draft Principles and the Latimer House Guidelines on judicial conduct.”He argued that in the ultimate analysis, the Constitution, the supreme law,Supply Authentic NFL Jerseys, relieved Parliament of the need to secure approval of Act No.17 of 2001 by referendum.Attorney General (AG) and Minister of Legal Affairs, Basil Williams, had emphasized the need for improving the perception of fairness in the Constitutional Court and for eliminating the backlog of cases in the judicial system.Williams in an interview with this newspaper had said that Government maintains its position that the Constitutional and Commercial Courts, both manned by one Judge, require additional adjudicators.The AG had said, “We believe there should be an additional Judge in the Commercial court and the Constitutional court. We will also make moves to deal with the case of insufficient Judges in the Court of Appeal as well. This is a serious matter for me.“With only one Judge in those important Courts, it would obviously lead to a backlog of more cases in the system and the Judges being overwhelmed. I intend to address that.”However, Chancellor of the Judiciary, Justice Carl Singh,Wholesale Jerseys 2018, had said that the addition of another Judge to the Constitutional Court may be desirable but constitutional matters are grave and weighty and as such, the CJ is the most senior Judge of the High court and the most experienced one at that.“So we shouldn’t be knocking the court. If there is dissatisfaction,Cheap NFL Jerseys China, there is the Court of Appeal and then there is the Caribbean Court of Justice,Cheap NHL Jerseys,” Justice Singh said.He had added, “When we get our full complement of Judges then we can address having two constitutional departments, but right now the judicial manpower does not permit it.”
    分享到:  微信微信
    收藏收藏
    Wholesale Jerseys China[url=http://www.wholesalechinanfljerseys.org/]Cheap Jerseys Free Shipping
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    本版积分规则

    手机版|人生大不同  

    GMT+8, 2024-11-11 08:02 , Processed in 0.065179 second(s), 28 queries .

    Powered by Discuz! X3.2

    © 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表